Fast-tracking the Future: Reflecting on the 2019 Dublin Declaration

In November 2019, we concluded the ICDE World Conference on Online Learning with the release of The Dublin Declaration. At the time of the World Conference, which attracted over 800 delegates from more than 80 countries, no one was predicting or even speculating on how our lives might change in the space of just a few months. Even our DCU Student Ambassadors who did a great job in assisting delegates throughout the event had no sense of how online education would become absolutely crucial to the continuation of their learning, and in some cases completion of their degrees, in the face of a global pandemic.

49013427708_83e4575512_c

In the prophetic words of our conference poem:

“We no longer stop learning when the darkness gathers”.

Poem3Since this poem was read out in such dramatic fashion during the World Conference Open Ceremony, the move to rapidly teaching online has forced many of us to think around corners and fast-track the future. A future that was not thought possible even amongst those working directly in the area. This claim is evident by a quick analysis of the collection of papers contained in the two volumes of the 2019 World Conference Proceedings:

•  Proceedings of the 2019 ICDE World Conference on Online Learning, Vol 1

•  Proceedings of the 2019 ICDE World Conference on Online Learning, Vol 2

In many respects, the adoption of online learning in response to the Covid-19 crisis is now an opportunity for educators to reimagine education for better futures. Accordingly, the World Conference theme of Transforming Lives and Societies is even more relevant than it was when delegates came together in Dublin.  With the benefit of reflection, The Dublin Declaration (reproduced at the bottom of this post in a more accessible font) is still highly relevant to the uncertain future we are facing.

Opening
At the time, The Dublin Declaration sought to tease out and distil some of the key messages about online learning, and hopefully these will not get lost in the great onlining of education at the start of the third decade of the 21st Century. While online learning is not the panacea that will by itself transform the education system, looking towards a new and better future, traditional face-to-face delivery models can no longer be viewed as the default or baseline of good education and lifelong learning. Our discussions back in November in Dublin renewed the importance of reimagining the art of the possible and the need for growing innovative mindsets in turbulent times.

IMG_5507There is a risk, however, the mainstreaming of online education will promote old 19th Century teaching methods on new 21st Century networks to merely dump large volumes of undigested information down modern digital diameter pipes to relatively passive learners, with no transformative advantage (Brown, Costello & Nic Giolla Mhichíl, 2020). Beyond the current health crisis, if we want to develop creative, innovative and highly imaginative learners capable to solving tomorrow’s problems today, then we need to value and support these dispositions in those who teach and in our future education systems.

Tensions remain, nevertheless, between traditional conceptions of education and the creation of more open cultures of innovation, which anchored in core values and practices serve to unlock the so-called “iron triangle” of widening access to learning whilst enhancing quality and reducing costs. In the post Covid-19 era, where the commercial “EdTech” sector is more prevalent than ever, questions of who is telling the online learning story, what are they telling and why, and who benefits most remain crucial to harnessing the transformative potential of digital technologies in the service of a quality education for all.

The Dublin Declaration

Set against the backdrop of Samhain, a Celtic tradition dating back thousands of years celebrating the changing of the seasons from light to dark, the 28th ICDE World Conference on Online Learning in Dublin brought together around 800 educators from 80 countries. Over five-days in November in 2019 the World Conference provided a timely opportunity to critique, critically reflect on and celebrate the many and varied facets of online education. Framed by the overarching theme of Transforming Lives and Societies, the discussions in Dublin explored competing powerful change forces and different and contrasting preferred futures for online learning. From a rich tapestry of future discourses in Dublin, the following strands help to tease out and distil some of the key messages.

  1. Shifting shapes

Online education is not a neat singular shape. There are a variety of forms of online education and greater understanding is still required of the contextual and societal contours and the influence of important cultural factors in supporting learning. Moreover, the boundaries between online, open, digital and traditional models of distance learning have become increasingly blurred—for better and for worse. Therefore, online and off-line education is not a simple duality between good and bad, old and new, public and private – such binary thinking fails to convey the complexity and rapidly shifting forms of online learning and education.

  1. Shades of Openness 

There is a sense in which Openness is the elixir, the new gold standard of education and research. However, openness can be opaque with many different meanings and challenges. A broad spectrum critique of open is continually required, so that a myriad of education and learning futures can emerge. A renewed commitment to open practices and  social justice for transformative learning experiences was asserted in Dublin.

  1. Sharpening the Shoots 

Talk of openness also raises controversial questions about business models. Such questions were not avoided in Dublin as the conference explored the evolving nature of the MOOC movement and the influence of commercial forces. But business models are not new and polemic debates do little to advance deeper understandings of how new models of online education might serve to unlock the so-called iron triangle of widening access to education whilst enhancing quality and reducing costs. Governments and policy-makers need to do more to fully harness the potential of online education to promote sustainable business models and implementation that support the goals of life-long learning and education for all.

  1.  Sunsets and Breaking Days  

A key theme emerging from Dublin was that traditional face-to-face delivery models should no longer be viewed as the default or baseline of education and lifelong learning. Indeed, new and emerging models of online learning challenge conceptions of good pedagogy—irrespective of when, where and how people choose to study and learn. The continuing development of online education is impacting all delivery models and diminishing the distinction between formal, non-formal and informal learning. This point is evidenced by the strong focus in Dublin on the continued emergence of micro-credentials and their position within the landscape of recognised learning pathways.

  1. Turning the Tide

Online learning is not the panacea that will by itself transform the education system. Discussions in Dublin renewed the importance of reimagining the art of the possible and the need for growing mindsets in turbulent times. A consistent theme is the hope that new online technologies will promote more transformative and considered learning experiences remains largely hype and technocentric. The conference highlighted the need for teachers, educational leaders, researchers and policy-makers to embrace and to critique current models of teaching, learning and assessment in context. Tensions remain between traditional conceptions of education and the creation of a culture of innovation. More creative, equitable and critical forms of pedagogy to redefine learning and education are required for the knowledge society and in response to the ecological crisis facing the planet.

  1.  Closing Chasms

The need for balance and disciplined debate to critique online education to expose the challenges, the big questions and indeed its limits were brought to the fore in Dublin. In this respect the ICDE World Conference supported rich debate, disagreement and the expression of differing viewpoints. This critique should not simply be rooted in simplistic narratives or comparisons. It requires sophisticated theoretical reasoning and empirical evidence drawn from multiple disciplines to challenge myths, misinformation and half-truths whilst adding to research and to inform transformative practice. Questions of who is telling the online learning story, what are they telling and why and who benefits most remain crucial to harnessing the transformative potential of digital technologies in the service of a quality education for all. In this respect the conversations emerging from Dublin reminds us to also ask whose story is not being told and whose voice is missing or misrepresented?

  1. Rays of Light

The Dublin Conference was anchored in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGS), the conversations served to paint a bigger picture of how online education has enormous potential globally to help support and transform lives and societies. With tones and intentions of optimism, realism and activism the ICDE World Conference on Online Learning has left us with the clear message to engage with issues of social justice. It  illustrated the importance and necessity of digital presence and participation of  indigenous heritage and culture in the networked world to promote diversity and to support context and  situated learning experiences. A rich tapestry of cultures and contexts in the online learning space connects learners and does not other their learning experiences. The concept  of othering, challenged the Dublin ICDE conference to renew our commitment to access, to inclusion and to lifelong learning and to reject hegemonic monolithic thinking. Delegates leave Dublin with a clear message for the future that online learning is committed to the values and practices of social justice, equity and ethics in a cohabited, sustainable society.

Conclusion 

At the heart of the ICDE World Conference in Dublin was the message of transformation. The challenge distilled by this declaration for all participants before we meet again in Natal in Brazil is to take ethical, sustainable and transformative actions that go beyond lofty aspirations.

Professor Mark Brown, Professor Mairéad Nic Giolla Mhichíl,  & Professor Joe O’Hara    

7th November, 2019

References

Brown, M., Costello, E., & Nic Giolla Mhichíl, M. (2020). Responding to Covid-19: The good, the bad, and the ugly of teaching onlineICDE Insider, 26th March.

Brown, M., Nic Giolla Mhichil, M., Beirne, E., & Costello, E. (eds.) (2020). Proceedings of the 2019 ICDE World Conference on Online Learning, Vol 1, Dublin City University, Dublin.

Brown, M., Nic Giolla Mhichil, M., Beirne, E., & Costello, E. (eds.) (2020). Proceedings of the 2019 ICDE World Conference on Online Learning, Vol 2, Dublin City University, Dublin.

“Out of Intense Complexities, Intense Simplicities Emerge”: Assessment and the Pivot Online

By Dr Orna Farrell

On the 20th of April, I gave a presentation at a webinar organised by European Distance and Elearning Network (EDEN) about how to design and manage assessments for online learning which was part of a webinar series called Education in Time of a Pandemic. The webinar contributors included Prof. Mark Brown from DCU’s National Institute for Digital Learning, Dr. Lisa Marie Blaschke from the University of Oldenburg and Dr. Alfredo Soeiro from the University of Porto. I started my presentation with a quotation from Winston Churchill:

“Out of intense complexities, intense simplicities emerge”.

I felt this quote was appropriate for the current educational context because although it is a very uncertain time, there could be potential to reimagine our approaches to assessment. For example, we could take this opportunity to clear out some of the deadwood or kill a few sacred cows in the educational system. The sacred cow I focused on was the campus-based examination system.

a27d24_44d4cfc1080b4edd8870dcc661db11c2~mv2
Photo by Biel Morro on Unsplash

In the literature on assessment, exams are considered to be a poor measure of student learning which emphasizes knowledge reproduction rather than critical thinking. For example:

“they tend to measure lower order thinking skills in a decontextualized manner at a time when the literature frequently argues for the benefits of a richer, authentic approach to assessment” (Villarroel, Boud, Bloxham, Bruna, 2020, p. 38)

If the literature indicates that richer authentic approaches to assessment can benefit student learning, why are higher education institutions so attached to exams? Face-to-face campus-based exams are surrounded by ritual, bureaucracy and awe in higher education. I think we should take advantage of the opportunity that the pivot online created by the Coronavirus pandemic and kill the sacred cow of closed book campus based exams permanently.

Replicating campus-based exams online through timed proctored online exams is not the solution. In her recent presentation at #Gastagoesglobal, Sheila McNeill talked about how online proctored exams promote a culture of distrust and surveillance and how we should instead be creating a culture of support, trust and development for our students.

Student Engagement and Covid-19

When designing alternative emergency assessments for our students we need to think about student engagement in the context of Covid-19 pandemic. Adapting Kahu’s (2013) model of student engagement to encompass the Covid19 pandemic context is a useful lens to help us understand how our students can engage and learn successfully during this crisis.

a27d24_d49dfe8ee2ac45e3b8ce52b1e1414a18~mv2.png

Important factors that we should consider are lifeload, course and assessment design, access to adequate broadband and computing equipment, the availability and accessibility of institutional remote online supports. Kahu (2013, p. 767) describes lifeload as “the sum of all the pressures a student has in their life, including university”, and is seen as being a critical factor influencing student engagement. Everyone including students and staff are experiencing increased lifeload pressures due to the pandemic, such as illness, caring responsibilities, home schooling, and remote working. Time management and organisational skills are key skills for student success (Farrell & Brunton, 2020). In addition, students are experiencing difficulties with broadband, access to computers, finding quiet study space and sufficient time to study. These pressures are impacting on our students well-being, their time, and their ability to learn successfully.

Our Approach to Crisis Assessment

In Dublin City University (DCU), the institution identified four key principles for crisis assessment:

  1. Validity

  2. Equivalence

  3. Proportionality

  4. Academic Integrity

These principles were applied across the University coupled with coupled advice for choosing alternative assessments to adapt exams into more appropriate alternative assessments. In our DCU Connected Humanities programmes, for example, which are modular online degrees we applied these four principles and adapted our exams into openbook take home assessments. Openbook take home assessments adhered to these principles and were a flexible, low bandwidth asynchronous assessment approach.

Alternative Assessment Ideas

In the webinar, we discussed a number of alternative assessment ideas, such as:

    • Eportfolio

    • Collaborative wiki

    • Asynchronous online debate

    • Vlog

    • Blog

    • Podcast

    • Online presentation

    • Asynchronous group project-Gdocs

    • Video creation

    • Reflective journal

    • Peer assessment

My colleagues from the NIDL, Suzanne Stone and Rob Lowney have created an edited open access resource called Exemplars and Case Studies of Technology Enhanced Assessment in HE and FE which has more details on these alternative assessment ideas. For more resources on alternative assessment and the pivot online, check out the NIDL Teaching Online Resource Bank.

Academic Integrity

The issue of academic integrity came up frequently in the discussion at the webinar. Our approach to academic integrity involves creative design of authentic assessment, moderation of marking, text matching software, clear guidelines to students about our expectations around referencing and the use of vivas to verify student academic work. These are detailed further in the resource below, and our Academic Integrity Self-Assessment Checklist.

a27d24_c6e451e614ab4275a45c3d4ccb482688~mv2.jpg

DCU (2018) Academic Integrity Principles

Final thoughts

In these unprecedented times, it is important that we support the well-being of our students, while addressing the need to have quality assessment. In the context of student engagement and Covid-19, using low bandwidth, flexible and asynchronous assessments may enable our students to succeed at completing their studies and #keeplearning.

References

DCU Teaching Enhancement Unit (2018). Academic Integrity Principles. Retrieved from Academic Integrity for Quality Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (INTEGRITY Project): https://teuintegrityproject.wordpress.com/

EDEN Webinar resources and recording https://www.eden-online.org/how-to-design-and-manage-assessments-for-online-learning/

Farrell, O. (2020) “Out of intense complexities, intense simplicities emerge.”: Assessment and the pivot online. Presentation at EDEN NAP Webinar.

Farrell, O., Brunton, J. (2020). A balancing act: a window into online student engagement experiences. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 17, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00199-x

Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505.

NIDL Resource bank https://www.dcu.ie/nidl/resources/Swiftly-Moving-Online-Coronavirus.shtml#Assessment

Villarroel, V., Boud, D., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., & Bruna, C. (2020;2019). Using principles of authentic assessment to redesign written examinations and tests. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(1), 38-49. doi:10.1080/14703297.2018.1564882

Stone, S. Lowney, R. (2020). Exemplars and Case Studies of Technology Enhanced Assessment in HE and FE

Note: This blog post originally appeared as a guest commentary on this Portuguese site established to support teaching online in response to the Covid-19 crisis.